Tracking the tools that decentralize the media. tools process ideas resources eventsav

unmediated

 

June 04, 2006

Hot on the heels of Friday's revelation in the New York Times that the Department of Justice and the FBI want Internet service providers to retain our attention data just in case they need to take a look at it, Steve Gillmor sends a memo to Bill Gates (with a few thoughts for the Attorney General as well):

Not only does this move collide with the goals of major cloud aggregators–Google for one has made it clear they will resist such demands as they have to some extent in the past–but it comes into direct conflict with the most potent wave in today's technology landscape: the user in charge. In a world where we recoil from attempts by spamsters, spyware, and identity thieves to steal our most personal data and use it against us, here comes Big Brother to demand our attention metadata without offering any service in compensation. At least Microsoft, Google, and Yahoo offer us free storage, calendar, or email in return for this data, even if it does go in and doesn't come back out. There is some sort of voluntary contract between users and providers.

Here's where the government bait and switch package starts to tick ominously: First it's about child porn. Everybody's against that. Then it's about terrorism. Ditto. But then, while we've got that data, let's go in and help our friends down at the MPAA and RIAA with their business model problem and police Intellectual Property "theft." What about peer-to-peer communications filled with inappropriate political concepts? When we've got you by the bitstream, folks, we decide what's OK, not you.


Originally posted by Michal Migurski from tecznotes links, remediated by yatta on Jun 4, 2006 at 09:41 PM