Tracking the tools that decentralize the media. tools process ideas resources eventsav

unmediated

 

June 06, 2006

Those looking for the FCC to impose net-neutrality or any other guidelines on Comcast, Time Warner, or AT&T as those companies seek approval to significantly increase their footprint shouldn't hold their breath, judging from comments by FCC chief Kevin Martin (MarketWatch). Martin seems to employ rhetoric that confuses the net-neutrality discussion with the right of incumbents to offer faster or slower speed tiers:
"Consumers need to be able to access all the content that's available over the Internet without being impeded by the access provider," Martin said. "But at the same time, we recognized that the people that are deploying these networks may offer differentiated speeds and differentiated products to the consumer. And if you offer different tiers of speeds, a consumer chooses the lowest tier, and he wants to access content that would require higher speeds than he has purchased, he's not being blocked from access. He just hasn't purchased the speed that's necessary."
We're not sure when anyone has ever suggested that incumbents should not be allowed to offer differentiated speed tiers. The folks at Techdirt are particularly unimpressed with Martin's latest commentary, and particularly his "regulation is evil" think tank mantra:
"Of course, all of this is double-speak. Martin loves regulation when it's politically useful, his idea of a level playing field means one that's slanted towards telcos and his idea of competition is a duopoly. He also remarked that the industry needs to deliver "more innovation" to consumers. Perhaps he should kick things off with some new thinking instead of rehashing these tired -- and ultimately ineffective -- ideas."

Originally from Broadbandreports, remediated by yatta on Jun 6, 2006 at 06:45 PM