Tracking the tools that decentralize the media. tools process ideas resources eventsav

unmediated

 

May 17, 2006

Bernhard Warner, in an opinion piece at the UK's Times Online, writes:
No matter how unappealing it may sound, the blogosphere is duty-bound to adopt the basic tenets of journalism-- identifying your sources, checking facts and never sacrificing accuracy and fairness for the sake of a "good" story. The role of watchdog demands you be fully identifiable and accountable. (Full disclosure: we journalists need you.

But earlier in his piece he writes:


According to the same poll, bloggers suffer the biggest credibility gap of all with just one in four surveyed regarding them as a trusted source of information. Bloggers bellow that it is illogical and unfair to lump all bloggers into a single category, but, I respond, you could say the same about media and government and business.

That's the very problem with journalists. They accurately write what they are fed, even when it is unfair and illogical -- and I might add stupid. Try this question: Do you trust books? It depends on which books you are talking about doesn't it. Since blogs are basically blank pieces of paper that then are used in a million different ways, to ask if you trust them is asinine. You could say the same thing about most polls concerning media and government.

Even when credible sources produce these over reaching polls, they tell us nothing about particulars; however, that does not stop professional journalists from using them over and over again as proof to make their points -- even when the point they want to make is how reliable and trustworthy they are.


Originally from PJNet Today, remediated by yatta on May 17, 2006 at 10:28 PM