Tracking the tools that decentralize the media. tools process ideas resources eventsav

unmediated

 

May 16, 2006

Sascha Meinrath says HandsofftheInternet.com is yet another prime example of astroturf in action.

I can only suspect that telecom incumbents pay some sort of professional PR group to create websites like this specifically to misinform and mislead the public. So I decided to start an investigation to figure out who HandsOff actually was.

A look at the "Membership Organizations" section -- and low and behold, membership organizations included: AT&T, Bell South, Cingular Communications, The National Association of Manufacturer and a host of industry front groups

Now, this is rather enlightening, and I probably could have stopped there. But what happens if you delve deeper?...

The Portland Oregonian editorialized (anonomously) that Net Neutrality is a bad thing:

Congress can't always tell what's best for the Internet, especially in anticipating problems that haven't yet occurred.

Net neutrality -- the idea that everybody should be equal in cyberspace -- has gained momentum as a populist movement but seems no closer to becoming law. A House committee recently rejected a Democrat-led effort to legislate the principle, and a current Republican-sponsored draft telecommunications bill mostly avoids the subject...

Rich Bader who runs EasyStreet Online Services, the largest independent ISP in Portland, has complete coverage of the Net Neutrality issue. Bader is pro-netneutrality. But he doesn't hit you over the head with his side of the story.

David Isenberg is the real deal. He’s put together the most definitive presentation about the Net Neutrality issue I’ve seen. It’s here with audio narration. For those of you looking for the “dumbed down” version of the issue, here’s a video, while not entirely accurate in my view, introduces the subject to lay people.

Anonomous editorials are a vestige of the 19th century. They should stimulate people to think and consider the issue. Not pitch a company line.

Advance/Newhouse Communications -- which owns the Oregonian -- is linked in a joint mobile partnership with Sprint Nextel. The newspaper never mentioned that fact.

Who would you be more inclinded to believe?


Originally posted by samc from Daily Wireless, remediated by yatta on May 16, 2006 at 10:01 PM