March 23, 2006
How big a gamble are phone carriers taking with television? It depends who you ask. American carriers have lost more than 5 million telephone customers to cable rivals Time Warner, Comcast and Cox during the last year as cable firms move into the VoIP marketplace, says America's Network.
Yesterday's announcment by Microsoft and DT to bring IP-TV to Germany's telephone users, highlights the seriousness of phone carriers to offer television.
Deutsche Telekom's IPTV will go live in ten major German cities - including Berlin, Hamburg, Cologne and Munich - later this year. DT plans to bring it to 50 German cities by the end of next year.
Microsoft says 13 broadband service providers will use its IPTV Edition software. They include Telecom Italia, T-Online France, British Telecommunications, Swisscom and Verizon. BellSouth, Bell Canada and Reliance Infocomm are still testing the software, reports C/Net.
Siemens executives said in December the global market for IPTV could hit $1 billion by 2009, with China expected to account for a quarter of the spending.
BT Vision is launching IPTV service this year in the UK. The service gives viewers access to on-demand films, music, and TV shows by combining access to digital-terrestrial channels through the aerial with VoD provided by broadband. The Philips set-top box uses Microsoft software. Trials are due to begin shortly.
IPTV is big in the far East, reports Converged Digest. In Hong Kong, PCCW's NOW Broadband TV has more than 500,000 IPTV subscribers (pdf). Over 13 million DSL subscribers in Japan will soon get IPTV services through Softbank/YahooBB and NTT. Korea, with the world's highest broadband penetration, plans to launch IPTV via Korea Telecom and Hanaro Telecom.
Japan's NTT and Korea's KT plan to offer 30 million and 10 million (respectively) FTTH subs by decade's end. UT Starcom signed a contract last month with China Telecom to begin IPTV services in two Chinese cities, Fuzhou and Quanzhou.
In the US, Verizon's FiOS is utilizing a "hybrid system" for video that uses 860-Mhz cable tv technology to deliver broadband video to the home. Verizon, which bought MCI in January, plans to spend an estimated $22 billion on its Fios rollout.
AT&T, on the other hand, is using Microsoft's IP-TV settop box and twisted pair with VDSL modulation to deliver 10-20 Mbps. AT&T/SBC liked the lower cost (using a consumer's current twisted pair) and by the ability to offer highly interactive features compared to cable.
Project Lightspeed, which began in San Antonio this January, initially is offering 200 channels, but promises as many as 1,000 when it expands the service to other markets by June.
By the end of 2007, ATT/SBC expects to reach 17 million households with FTTN and nearly 1 million with FTTP. In 2005, SBC said it expected that its total capital expenditures will be at the high end of its 2004 guidance range of $5 billion to $5.5 billion. AT&T, with BellSouth, will have 70 million landline subscribers.
Research firm Parks Associates (above) estimates 70 million users around the world will embrace IPTV by 2010, up from 5 million last year. The IPTV market is expected to grow as much as 25% annually. Infonetics Research says there will be 13 million IPTV users in North America by 2009.
The new on-demand IPTV paradigm has profound consequences for the old media ecosystem – traditional TV channels, previously key for ‘branding’, are in danger of losing their influence, says Converged Digest. The $60 billion spent on U.S. television advertising, annually could get re-directed, opines Bob Garfield (MP-3).
Americas Network has a good overview. Telephony Magazine has complete coverage of TelecomNext while IPTV News and Google News have the latest poop on IP.
Related DailyWireless stories include;
IPTV: Is It Soup Yet?,
IPTV Networking,
Telco's Left Behind in IPTV Armageddon?,
Cuban: Broadcasting Not Dead,
Wireless IP-TV Box,
IP-TV End Game,
Cisco Buying Scientific Atlanta,
SBC Picks IP-TV Settops,
GoogleNet?, The Free Triple Play, VDSL-2 Ratified,
IPTV: Is It Soup Yet?, IP-TV Settops, Legislators: Don't Mess With SBC, DirecTV + WiMax?, Muni Wireless Laws, and Duopoly Laws.
|
unmediated.av:
The Weekly Show

drawing from extrastruggle.
We've been having a back channel conversation amongst the trackers at unmediated about how/whether to update the way in which we aggregate, present, and make useable the content on the site, in light of all the various aggregators, digg and its clones, and role model group blog sites that we all consume/use/hate/love. Since we all primarily support open media movements and the freedom of bits and so forth, and with all of us being busy with our primary projects, we are looking for ways to make getting content on the site easier and more streamlined, while making it obvious that we are presenting other sources content. With the availability of open API's for just about any type of media aggegration literally getting past the saturation point, and mashups taking every possible form, we are wondering, is it time to take a step back, or a step forward with how/what we do at umediated? In the course of my surfing today, i found this new site, Boxxet Which just might be the straw that breaks the camel's back in how we all perceive the current mix and match nature of the web as it now stands. What's different about Boxxet from other aggregators and mashups like the newest entry popurls, (which aggregates digg, slashdot, reddit, newsvine, tailrank, and flickr) is that Boxxet is a Website generator. Thats right, just pop in all the urls u want to aggregate (and WHAT from them) choose how u want to format it, plug in the url that u want it to be accessed at... and whammo: Your own site with everyone elses content, and all thats left to do is decide whether googleplex or yahooza is going to be the source of your linklove revenue. And if u have on older domain that u plug this into...well, we all know how the pageranking with search engines work by now. It used to be that u had to have a bit of code knowledge to make all this stuff work. Eyebeam's Re-blog engine which powers this site was not a simple undertaking at the time that Michael Frumin and Michael Migurski put it all together... a half a year before Marc Broadband-mechanicked the term Reblog as his latest buzzword before casting his attention on the ourmedia-meme. (kudo's, kudo's) But now, with the cut and paste mentality of webculture that we at unmediated have helped create, the pace at which people are remixing and repurposing code is accelerating at a rate similar to the curve that we saw with pro-sumer desktop video... almost anyone can do it. I have this sinking feeling in my gut that we will arrive sooner than later at the same existential threshold that the film studios and record labels are squirming under to our joyful cries of "die, dinosaurs, die!". What i am wondering, is how long until my hero of the open-information movement, Cory Doctorow, and the rest of our pals at BB will tolerate re-aggregation and repurposing of his content, (now that he is investing so much more time at the site) before he (or any of one us) screams, "FOUL!" Stewart Butterfield over at Flickr is dealing with this beast at the moment...and i have to admire the dryness with which he states, "I loaded the FlickrCentral pool and firefox got up to using 240mb of ram before dying. So that's not a great user experience, but it's really terrible for Flickr. If it catches on and you don't limit it, we'll have to cut you off :\" Sure, Stewart, blame it on the user experience and firefox. ;) I admire your candor, and personal attention/approach to what has become one of the hottest new BRANDS in Web 2.0 ...that u still have time to be personal and all flickr-fuzzy even after being acquired, but I am sure that your jeans feel like they're fitting a bit tighter all of a sudden. Pretty soon, I expect, a lot of us bell-bottomed infornistas are going to wake up in a similar pair of Jordaches. I'm curious which of us will cut the inseams and sew in another totally different material to keep our style,and which of us will claim that now that we're wearing skintight jeans ("they're really really comfortable...REALLY! You think i should get a pair of Reeboks to go with 'em?"), that the manufacture of bell-bottoms should be forbidden. I point this all out in good humour only to illustrate a point: The times, they are('nt) a changin'>, and Cory just might wake up one day soon in his magic kingdom, and say "Hey, man, where'd all my whuffie go? And he's going to have no choice but to join Walt's pinstripesuits in pushing for copyright extension. It's a pill i hope he (and we) never have to swallow. So i pose the question to our community readers: How do you see unmediated-Are we crossing the boundaries in how we repurpose content? Would you like to see more editorializing? Narrower/Broader scope? Are we a repository of information that you come back to use, or just part of your daily information addiction? Let us know... I, for one, would like to have an idea about what pair of jeans to wear this year ;) michael
Featured Project
Berkeley Conference: Online Video and the Future of Television - Friday, September 30, 2005
This one-day conference brings together archivists, educators, technologists, entrepreneurs, producers, legal experts, and investors to explore the enormous promise offered by the availability of online video and television content. Demonstrations and interactive panel discussions will highlight new video technologies, services, legal issues, and economic models. Participants from diverse – and until now, largely disconnected – specialties will be especially encouraged to interact.
del.icio.us/tag/unmediated
[+]
About unmediated
unmediated is a group blog that tracks the tools, processes,
and ideas being used to decentralize media production and distribution.
|
flickr/tag/
citizenmedia
[+]
|