Tracking the tools that decentralize the media. tools process ideas resources eventsav

unmediated

 

March 29, 2006

I've gotten some feedback on my content objects post, and I'm realizing that I should expand and clarify a bunch of things.

In a world of content objects, there are no copies. There are no mp3 downloads. Special Edition DVDs are obsolete. We think we want to own this content because we've only known audio and video content in a world of masters and dupes.

The content sits online in one place and one place only. There are no intermediaries. You interface with that content by calling it up from the source server which transcodes a stream best suited for your access device.

In the master+dupe world, there are 1 million instances (read:paper copies) of The New York Times in circulation each day. In the content object world (read:online), there is only one NYTimes.com that gets 22 million unique visitors to one instance. Just think of what the world would be like if we could only view web pages through downloading pdfs. Now ask yourself why is it okay that we do this with our music?

The difference between video captured to media during the production process and your final content object is the meaning conveyed through the final edit. A content object is curated. A content object can also be inserted as a whole or in part into a playlist, making it part of a greater content object.

Content objects are neither blogjects nor spimes though they share many of their underlying ideas of and rely on a confluence of emerging network and processor technologies in order to work. Content objects are probably the close cousin of blogjects and Project Xanadu. But I need a little more time to figure out the lineage.

I used to complain that our content shouldn't be married to our objects. Now I realize that our content shouldn't be bound to their particular instances.

(Original post here. -kc.)


Originally from braintag, remediated by yatta on Mar 29, 2006 at 12:22 AM