Tracking the tools that decentralize the media. tools process ideas resources eventsav

unmediated

 

February 22, 2006

Part I: reblogging some stuff

Josh Kinberg on unmediated: NBC sends YouTube Take-Down Notice for SNL Lazy Sunday

Of course, some people think that YouTube should be congratulated for their copyright infringing practices. Here's what Xeni Jardin says about it on BoingBoing:

Boing Boing: NBC nastygrams YouTube over "Lazy Sunday"

This isn't like another television network broadcasting the skit without permission. YouTube is a service through which individual fans can share stuff they're nuts about with others. NBC issuing a C&D to YouTube makes about as much sense as NBC sending attorneys to the homes of every blogger or Livejournaler user who posted a link to a torrent somewhere

Sorry, Xeni, that's completely wrong. In the same blog entry where YouTube responds to the take-down notice they also say:

YouTube is now serving up more than 15 million videos streamed per day- that's nearly 465M videos streamed per month

So how exactly are they different from a TV network? How are they exempt from the laws and standard practices of the industry?

Part II: explaining it

Josh Kinberg is the main writer above. Josh is a co-founder of the videoblogging subculture and co-creator of FireAnt, a videoblog aggregator. Josh is arguing against YouTube from a lightnet perspective. He's an activist for internet video which is native to the internet, meaning the partipatory kind.

Xeni Jardin is the blogger he's responding to. Xeni is a contributor to BoingBoing, an important blog whose digital politics are from the P2P period. These political ideas center on defending unauthorized distribution.

Both Josh and Xeni are part of the bleeding edge, and not long ago it would have been very surprising to see such a stark difference in their views. What this exchange shows is that lightnet is a new fault line in digital politics. Is the work at hand about samizdat, as Xeni thinks, or about participatory media, as Josh thinks?

I have personally been blown off with gusto on this issue by members of the samizdat wing who felt that lightnet is either collaboration in the Vichy mold or just plain pussy. These ideas are new, counterintuitive and have near-zero visibility outside of the participatory media movement.