December 05, 2005
Research firm Maravedis has a new study out on the licensed 2.5 GHz Broadband Radio Service (BRS) and the licensed 2.3 GHz
Wireless Communications Service (WCS) band. They calculate the number of licenses and coverage in the 2.3 and 2.5 GHz bands.
Those frequencies are critical for the future of mobile WiMax in the United States. Without them it's not going anywhere.
Under the FCC terms of the Sprint Nextel merger, Sprint agreed to offer at least 15 million Americans broadband wireless access within four years, and an additional 15 million potential subscribers within six
years using their 2.5 GHz frequencies.
In 2004, the FCC changed the MDS/ITFS frequency plan. Commercial Broadband (BRS) and Educational (EBS) broadband services are now allocated differently. The television oriented EBS service was moved in the middle of the band to reduce interference with the weaker 2-way data services.
As of November 2005, over 1,700 BRS Licenses and 2,500 EBS Licenses (formerly ITFS) were listed on the FCC's ULS License Search web site. The FCC's Tower Search has additional information. Maravedis estimated the broadband wireless licensees (below), from the FCC's ULS License Search web site.
| Licensee |
PSA |
BTA |
Potential Subs |
| BellSouth Wireless |
36 |
6 |
9,070,577 |
| Clearwire |
59 |
24 |
4,693,347 |
| Nextel/Sprint |
268 |
198 |
157,519,832 |
Protected Service Areas (PSA) is an exclusive license service
granted to either a BRS or EBS licensee. Each PSA is comprised of a 35 Mile
Radius surrounding the licensed transmitter site.
Basic Trading Areas (BTA) is geographic region defined by a group of
counties that surround a city as formulated by Rand McNally. There are 493 BTAs in the U.S.
Owners of incumbent MDS (now called BRS) and ITFS (Instructional Fixed Television Service) (now called EBS), hope mobile WiMax, likely to be available in a year or two, will take off. EBS television licensees must have a minimum of 20 hours per 6 MHz channel per week of educational use of EBS spectrum.
The 2.3 GHz WCS band, currently has a total of 282 x 5.0 MHz licenses, according to Maravedis. Many of the 2.3 GHz WCS licenses, granted in 1997, will be due to expire in 2007. The FCC gave considerable flexibility to satellite radio's 2.3 GHz DARS (Digital Audio Radio Service) to put their satellite "gap fillers" where they need them (and even where they don't).
Some fear the 2.3 GHz band will be one big mess resulting in interference between broadband wireless providers and satellite radio repeaters -- just like the FCC screwed up with Nextel. Or maybe the problem will just disappear if XM satellite radio buys out the 2.3 GHz broadband wireless band for their own purposes.
WiMax at 2.3GHz? Forgetaboutit.
Satellite radio, at 2.3 GHz, is NOT going away in the United States.
It's taking over.
Bell South hoped to provide WiMax at 2.3 GHz. Just like Korea.
Instead, Bell South has become a voice in the wilderness. Overpowered by 2000 watt transmitters, restricted by spectrum allocations, out maneuvered by lobbyists.
The FCC doesn't have a plan for broadband wireless access. Maybe Kevin Martin has a plan. Oh, no wait...he's already a lobbyist.
- Sam
|
The FCC also moved to open up the 3.5 GHz band, particularly for rural populations. But the 3.6GHz spectrum will be shared, unlike the 2.5GHz and 2.3GHz bands.
Other frequency options include the 5.8 GHz band with 100 Mhz of unlicensed bandwidth - but the restricted range and unlicensed nature makes mobility impractical. The 700 Mhz band is expected to have good range and might be an option in 3-4 years, but the 6-12 Mhz bandwidth will limit capacity of any licensed 700 Mhz network.
The FCC can appear to be insular with industry lobbyists guiding FCC policy. Why, for example, isn't there more information on the proposed buyout of the 2.3 GHz band by XM radio? Inquiring minds want to know.
Related DailyWireless stories include; FCC: 97lb Weakling, XM Buys 2.3GHz, The FCC Opens the 3650MHz band, Battle at 3 Dot 5, 3.5 GHz: Licensed or Un?
Fixed Vrs Mobile WiMax,
Navini Activates 2.3GHz in USA, President Wants 90MHz,
Mobile WiMax Chips, Heartland Says The World Is Round,
McCaw Profile & WCS, The 700 Mhz Club, Samsung Demos WiBro,
WiBro Three-Way, Arraycomm + Intel Beam WiMax,
Sprint + Motorola Test WiMax,
Navini's Mobile WiMax, 4G War in Sydney,
WiMax 16d+ Dilemma,
WiMax: Will It Stay or Will It Go?, WiMax World Wrap.
Originally posted by samc from Daily Wireless, remediated by exiledsurfer on Dec 5, 2005 at 07:32 PM
|
unmediated.av:
The Weekly Show

drawing from extrastruggle.
We've been having a back channel conversation amongst the trackers at unmediated about how/whether to update the way in which we aggregate, present, and make useable the content on the site, in light of all the various aggregators, digg and its clones, and role model group blog sites that we all consume/use/hate/love. Since we all primarily support open media movements and the freedom of bits and so forth, and with all of us being busy with our primary projects, we are looking for ways to make getting content on the site easier and more streamlined, while making it obvious that we are presenting other sources content. With the availability of open API's for just about any type of media aggegration literally getting past the saturation point, and mashups taking every possible form, we are wondering, is it time to take a step back, or a step forward with how/what we do at umediated? In the course of my surfing today, i found this new site, Boxxet Which just might be the straw that breaks the camel's back in how we all perceive the current mix and match nature of the web as it now stands. What's different about Boxxet from other aggregators and mashups like the newest entry popurls, (which aggregates digg, slashdot, reddit, newsvine, tailrank, and flickr) is that Boxxet is a Website generator. Thats right, just pop in all the urls u want to aggregate (and WHAT from them) choose how u want to format it, plug in the url that u want it to be accessed at... and whammo: Your own site with everyone elses content, and all thats left to do is decide whether googleplex or yahooza is going to be the source of your linklove revenue. And if u have on older domain that u plug this into...well, we all know how the pageranking with search engines work by now. It used to be that u had to have a bit of code knowledge to make all this stuff work. Eyebeam's Re-blog engine which powers this site was not a simple undertaking at the time that Michael Frumin and Michael Migurski put it all together... a half a year before Marc Broadband-mechanicked the term Reblog as his latest buzzword before casting his attention on the ourmedia-meme. (kudo's, kudo's) But now, with the cut and paste mentality of webculture that we at unmediated have helped create, the pace at which people are remixing and repurposing code is accelerating at a rate similar to the curve that we saw with pro-sumer desktop video... almost anyone can do it. I have this sinking feeling in my gut that we will arrive sooner than later at the same existential threshold that the film studios and record labels are squirming under to our joyful cries of "die, dinosaurs, die!". What i am wondering, is how long until my hero of the open-information movement, Cory Doctorow, and the rest of our pals at BB will tolerate re-aggregation and repurposing of his content, (now that he is investing so much more time at the site) before he (or any of one us) screams, "FOUL!" Stewart Butterfield over at Flickr is dealing with this beast at the moment...and i have to admire the dryness with which he states, "I loaded the FlickrCentral pool and firefox got up to using 240mb of ram before dying. So that's not a great user experience, but it's really terrible for Flickr. If it catches on and you don't limit it, we'll have to cut you off :\" Sure, Stewart, blame it on the user experience and firefox. ;) I admire your candor, and personal attention/approach to what has become one of the hottest new BRANDS in Web 2.0 ...that u still have time to be personal and all flickr-fuzzy even after being acquired, but I am sure that your jeans feel like they're fitting a bit tighter all of a sudden. Pretty soon, I expect, a lot of us bell-bottomed infornistas are going to wake up in a similar pair of Jordaches. I'm curious which of us will cut the inseams and sew in another totally different material to keep our style,and which of us will claim that now that we're wearing skintight jeans ("they're really really comfortable...REALLY! You think i should get a pair of Reeboks to go with 'em?"), that the manufacture of bell-bottoms should be forbidden. I point this all out in good humour only to illustrate a point: The times, they are('nt) a changin'>, and Cory just might wake up one day soon in his magic kingdom, and say "Hey, man, where'd all my whuffie go? And he's going to have no choice but to join Walt's pinstripesuits in pushing for copyright extension. It's a pill i hope he (and we) never have to swallow. So i pose the question to our community readers: How do you see unmediated-Are we crossing the boundaries in how we repurpose content? Would you like to see more editorializing? Narrower/Broader scope? Are we a repository of information that you come back to use, or just part of your daily information addiction? Let us know... I, for one, would like to have an idea about what pair of jeans to wear this year ;) michael
Featured Project
Berkeley Conference: Online Video and the Future of Television - Friday, September 30, 2005
This one-day conference brings together archivists, educators, technologists, entrepreneurs, producers, legal experts, and investors to explore the enormous promise offered by the availability of online video and television content. Demonstrations and interactive panel discussions will highlight new video technologies, services, legal issues, and economic models. Participants from diverse – and until now, largely disconnected – specialties will be especially encouraged to interact.
del.icio.us/tag/unmediated
[+]
About unmediated
unmediated is a group blog that tracks the tools, processes,
and ideas being used to decentralize media production and distribution.
|
flickr/tag/
citizenmedia
[+]
|