Tracking the tools that decentralize the media. tools process ideas resources eventsav

unmediated

 

December 05, 2005

Habitat Jam finished up yesterday - a facilitated online forum by UN-HABITAT, IBM, the Government of Canada, and others that aimed to bring together thousands of participants for productive discussions around six urban themes. It succeeded only partially in its ambitious goals, but that's the nature of experiments. But from its problems, we may be able to tease out some lessons and principles for future large-scale distributed meetings.

This is a hard problem. Forums like Slashdot can handle millions of users, yet lack a sense of focus and a real-time component. The more immersive technology behind Habitat Jam (which has been used for awhile by IBM) shows promise, but is clearly missing important elements: effective searches of previous posts; summaries of the "discussion to date" to avoid repetition on basic issues; a user-rating system for posts as they are read to identify the more interesting ones (aka, "collaborative filtering").

Then there are the even tougher questions: How can a sense of "discussion" be kept in a large threaded forum? Would it be better to have multiple smaller groups discussing the same themes, and sending their best ideas to a common second-level forum? How can inclusiveness and diversity be balanced with selectivity and high performance?

How would you talk with 100 000 people?

(Posted by Hassan Masum in Your Turn at 02:24 AM)


Originally posted by Hassan Masum from WorldChanging: Another World Is Here, remediated by exiledsurfer on Dec 5, 2005 at 07:49 PM