November 08, 2005
The average weekday circulation at U.S. newspapers fell 2.6 percent in the six month-period ending this September. Here are the figures for the 20 biggest U.S. newspapers, as reported Monday by the
Audit Bureau of Circulations. The percentage changes are from the
comparable year-ago period.
- USA Today, 2,296,335, down 0.59 per cent
- The Wall Street Journal, 2,083,660, down 1.10 per cent
- The New York Times, 1,126,190, up 0.46 per cent
- Los Angeles Times, 843,432, down 3.79 per cent
- New York Daily News, 688,584, down 3.70 per cent
- The Washington Post, 678,779, down 4.09 per cent
- New York Post, 662,681, down 1.74 per cent
- Chicago Tribune, 586,122, down 2.47 per cent
- Houston Chronicle, 521,419, down 6.01 per cent
- The Boston Globe, 414,225, down 8.25 per cent
- The Arizona Republic, 411,043, down 0.54 per cent
- The Star-Ledger of Newark, N.J. , 400,092, up 0.01 per cent
- San Francisco Chronicle, 391,681, down 16.4 per cent
- Star Tribune of Minneapolis-St. Paul, 374,528, down 0.26 per cent
- The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 362,426, down 8.73 per cent
- The Philadelphia Inquirer, 357,679, down 3.16 per cent
- Detroit Free Press, 341,248, down 2.18 per cent
- The Plain Dealer, Cleveland, 339,055, down 4.46 per cent
- The Oregonian, Portland, 333,515, down 1.24 per cent
- The San Diego Union-Tribune, 314,279, down 6.24 per cent.
Circulation has been steadily declining at newspapers for several
years as readers look to other media such as cable TV and the Internet
for news. Tougher rules on telemarketing have also hurt newspapers'
ability to sign up new readers.
Newspapers also face sluggish growth in advertising, higher
newsprint prices and increasing concern among investors about their
growth prospects. The second-largest newspaper publisher in the
country, Knight Ridder Inc., is facing a revolt from two of its top
shareholders, who want the company to be sold.
The World is Flat (mp3).
Related DailyWireless stories include Interactive Journalism Awards,
Camphones for Journalists,
Rebuilding Media, Newspaper Podcasts?,
Portable Photostories,
Global Blog,
NY Times Blinkx, BBC's Mobile Video, CBS/Comcast Broadband,
Handheld Tablets, Rollout e-Reader,
Interactive TV News, The Feed Room,
ABC News Now Looks to Future, Publishers Buy Online Content,
Mobile TV Expands,
Big Media Mobilizes, and
U.S. Gets MobileTV via DVB-H.
|
unmediated.av:
The Weekly Show

drawing from extrastruggle.
We've been having a back channel conversation amongst the trackers at unmediated about how/whether to update the way in which we aggregate, present, and make useable the content on the site, in light of all the various aggregators, digg and its clones, and role model group blog sites that we all consume/use/hate/love. Since we all primarily support open media movements and the freedom of bits and so forth, and with all of us being busy with our primary projects, we are looking for ways to make getting content on the site easier and more streamlined, while making it obvious that we are presenting other sources content. With the availability of open API's for just about any type of media aggegration literally getting past the saturation point, and mashups taking every possible form, we are wondering, is it time to take a step back, or a step forward with how/what we do at umediated? In the course of my surfing today, i found this new site, Boxxet Which just might be the straw that breaks the camel's back in how we all perceive the current mix and match nature of the web as it now stands. What's different about Boxxet from other aggregators and mashups like the newest entry popurls, (which aggregates digg, slashdot, reddit, newsvine, tailrank, and flickr) is that Boxxet is a Website generator. Thats right, just pop in all the urls u want to aggregate (and WHAT from them) choose how u want to format it, plug in the url that u want it to be accessed at... and whammo: Your own site with everyone elses content, and all thats left to do is decide whether googleplex or yahooza is going to be the source of your linklove revenue. And if u have on older domain that u plug this into...well, we all know how the pageranking with search engines work by now. It used to be that u had to have a bit of code knowledge to make all this stuff work. Eyebeam's Re-blog engine which powers this site was not a simple undertaking at the time that Michael Frumin and Michael Migurski put it all together... a half a year before Marc Broadband-mechanicked the term Reblog as his latest buzzword before casting his attention on the ourmedia-meme. (kudo's, kudo's) But now, with the cut and paste mentality of webculture that we at unmediated have helped create, the pace at which people are remixing and repurposing code is accelerating at a rate similar to the curve that we saw with pro-sumer desktop video... almost anyone can do it. I have this sinking feeling in my gut that we will arrive sooner than later at the same existential threshold that the film studios and record labels are squirming under to our joyful cries of "die, dinosaurs, die!". What i am wondering, is how long until my hero of the open-information movement, Cory Doctorow, and the rest of our pals at BB will tolerate re-aggregation and repurposing of his content, (now that he is investing so much more time at the site) before he (or any of one us) screams, "FOUL!" Stewart Butterfield over at Flickr is dealing with this beast at the moment...and i have to admire the dryness with which he states, "I loaded the FlickrCentral pool and firefox got up to using 240mb of ram before dying. So that's not a great user experience, but it's really terrible for Flickr. If it catches on and you don't limit it, we'll have to cut you off :\" Sure, Stewart, blame it on the user experience and firefox. ;) I admire your candor, and personal attention/approach to what has become one of the hottest new BRANDS in Web 2.0 ...that u still have time to be personal and all flickr-fuzzy even after being acquired, but I am sure that your jeans feel like they're fitting a bit tighter all of a sudden. Pretty soon, I expect, a lot of us bell-bottomed infornistas are going to wake up in a similar pair of Jordaches. I'm curious which of us will cut the inseams and sew in another totally different material to keep our style,and which of us will claim that now that we're wearing skintight jeans ("they're really really comfortable...REALLY! You think i should get a pair of Reeboks to go with 'em?"), that the manufacture of bell-bottoms should be forbidden. I point this all out in good humour only to illustrate a point: The times, they are('nt) a changin'>, and Cory just might wake up one day soon in his magic kingdom, and say "Hey, man, where'd all my whuffie go? And he's going to have no choice but to join Walt's pinstripesuits in pushing for copyright extension. It's a pill i hope he (and we) never have to swallow. So i pose the question to our community readers: How do you see unmediated-Are we crossing the boundaries in how we repurpose content? Would you like to see more editorializing? Narrower/Broader scope? Are we a repository of information that you come back to use, or just part of your daily information addiction? Let us know... I, for one, would like to have an idea about what pair of jeans to wear this year ;) michael
Featured Project
Berkeley Conference: Online Video and the Future of Television - Friday, September 30, 2005
This one-day conference brings together archivists, educators, technologists, entrepreneurs, producers, legal experts, and investors to explore the enormous promise offered by the availability of online video and television content. Demonstrations and interactive panel discussions will highlight new video technologies, services, legal issues, and economic models. Participants from diverse – and until now, largely disconnected – specialties will be especially encouraged to interact.
del.icio.us/tag/unmediated
[+]
About unmediated
unmediated is a group blog that tracks the tools, processes,
and ideas being used to decentralize media production and distribution.
|
flickr/tag/
citizenmedia
[+]
|