Tracking the tools that decentralize the media. tools process ideas resources eventsav

unmediated

 

October 10, 2005

AP: Key Ruling Backs Blog and Web Rights. The Delaware Supreme Court on Wednesday reversed a lower court decision that had required an Internet service provider to disclose the identity of an anonymous blogger who targeted a local elected official on a newspaper site. It was hailed nationally as the first state ruling in such a case.

This ruling is a big deal because it affirms an important principle: that people suing to get the identity of anonymous online posters should have at least a plausible case that they have a defamation (or copyright infringement, etc.) case in the first place.

That said, I'm not a fan on anonymous sniping from the cyber-bushes, as the person in this case seems to have been. People should stand behind their words in all but the most limited circumstances, such as when their lives might be endangered if their identities were disclosed.

We allow pseudonyms in the comments here, but we also require a valid e-mail address before anyone can post a comment. (We ask for real names in blog postings.) For the most part people behave in a civil manner.

On sites where totally anonymous posts are allowed, I give such postings a minus credibility rating. That is, I start off disbelieving everything these folks say, and unless they provide direct evidence for their claims I assume they're false.

If a totally anonymous poster starts off with, say, -10 credibility points, people who post under a pseudonym start off at zero on this scale. They may earn some points over time, but they have to persuade me.

People who use their real names start off with positive credibility ratings. They have to make serious mistakes of fact to lose my trust.

We're all learning how to gauge trust in this arena. Let's keep anonymity but try not to misuse it.