July 25, 2005
Growing up in the 70s on Long Island, I had a pretty set after-school routine. Throw my coat over the living room railing, throw my books on the kitchen counter, grab a soda and a big bag of chips or cookies and throw myself on the couch in front of the television set. Most afternoons included F-Troop, The Munsters, I Dream of Jeanie, Batman, The Beverly Hillbillies and of course, The Addams Family. Most people who know me, blame my ADHD personality of the amount of TV I watched as a kid. I’m sure they’re right.
Back then, I knew that Channel 11 (WPIX-TV) and Channel 5 (WNEW-TV, now WNYW-TV) were “my” channels – especially from 3pm to 7pm on weekdays. Saturday afternoons belonged to ABC’s Wide World of Sports, but I’m getting ahead of myself. Back then we enjoyed a 25 channel universe, but all the cool stuff (from my point of view) was happening on two or three channels. This is a very old story and everyone in the business knows this, so what’s the point?
Well, as it turns out, the advertisers who supported those shows knew a great deal about me. In fact, they knew that I wanted a Johnny 7 OMA, they knew exactly which Hotwheels cars I was going to need and they knew exactly how important Fritos were to an adolescent living in suburban New York in the 70s. I was part of the Pepsi Generation -- Commin’ at ya ... Goin’ Strong!
I couldn’t talk back to the television set (if I did, I certainly was not expecting a response), but it could and did talk to me. The box held my attention, I watched the commercials that interested me, and ignored the ones for Barbi and Easy Bake Ovens. They weren’t really meant for me anyway. Let’s fast forward 30 years to this week’s announcement about Apple iTunes and the very probable future of Apple introducing a family of Video iPods. Imagine a video experience that works with playlists and podcasting schemas that are in tune with your behaviors, wants, needs and desires. This will be a completely personal video experience unlike anything we have ever experienced before ... or will it?
The deep, dark, dirty little secret is that most of the big brands can’t even begin to plan media campaigns around individuals. The optimization programs just don’t exist. In fact, most media optimization programs are totally quantitative and don’t really look at the creative or qualitative element in the optimization algorithms. What they actually do is look at populations and predict, as best they can, where you will be at a given time and what the likelihood of selling you something will be. That’s how media is planned and purchased and that process is not going to change overnight, it will evolve over time.
So, how personal is personalization? How important is two-way communication? What is the compelling reason to get granular and, if you can, what should you get granular about? These are just a few of the questions that we, as in industry, need to answer and we’d better do it soon. I’m pretty sure that my teenage, weekday afternoon playlist is going to hit my iPod before you can say, “Tish ... I love when you speak French!”
|
unmediated.av:
The Weekly Show

drawing from extrastruggle.
We've been having a back channel conversation amongst the trackers at unmediated about how/whether to update the way in which we aggregate, present, and make useable the content on the site, in light of all the various aggregators, digg and its clones, and role model group blog sites that we all consume/use/hate/love. Since we all primarily support open media movements and the freedom of bits and so forth, and with all of us being busy with our primary projects, we are looking for ways to make getting content on the site easier and more streamlined, while making it obvious that we are presenting other sources content. With the availability of open API's for just about any type of media aggegration literally getting past the saturation point, and mashups taking every possible form, we are wondering, is it time to take a step back, or a step forward with how/what we do at umediated? In the course of my surfing today, i found this new site, Boxxet Which just might be the straw that breaks the camel's back in how we all perceive the current mix and match nature of the web as it now stands. What's different about Boxxet from other aggregators and mashups like the newest entry popurls, (which aggregates digg, slashdot, reddit, newsvine, tailrank, and flickr) is that Boxxet is a Website generator. Thats right, just pop in all the urls u want to aggregate (and WHAT from them) choose how u want to format it, plug in the url that u want it to be accessed at... and whammo: Your own site with everyone elses content, and all thats left to do is decide whether googleplex or yahooza is going to be the source of your linklove revenue. And if u have on older domain that u plug this into...well, we all know how the pageranking with search engines work by now. It used to be that u had to have a bit of code knowledge to make all this stuff work. Eyebeam's Re-blog engine which powers this site was not a simple undertaking at the time that Michael Frumin and Michael Migurski put it all together... a half a year before Marc Broadband-mechanicked the term Reblog as his latest buzzword before casting his attention on the ourmedia-meme. (kudo's, kudo's) But now, with the cut and paste mentality of webculture that we at unmediated have helped create, the pace at which people are remixing and repurposing code is accelerating at a rate similar to the curve that we saw with pro-sumer desktop video... almost anyone can do it. I have this sinking feeling in my gut that we will arrive sooner than later at the same existential threshold that the film studios and record labels are squirming under to our joyful cries of "die, dinosaurs, die!". What i am wondering, is how long until my hero of the open-information movement, Cory Doctorow, and the rest of our pals at BB will tolerate re-aggregation and repurposing of his content, (now that he is investing so much more time at the site) before he (or any of one us) screams, "FOUL!" Stewart Butterfield over at Flickr is dealing with this beast at the moment...and i have to admire the dryness with which he states, "I loaded the FlickrCentral pool and firefox got up to using 240mb of ram before dying. So that's not a great user experience, but it's really terrible for Flickr. If it catches on and you don't limit it, we'll have to cut you off :\" Sure, Stewart, blame it on the user experience and firefox. ;) I admire your candor, and personal attention/approach to what has become one of the hottest new BRANDS in Web 2.0 ...that u still have time to be personal and all flickr-fuzzy even after being acquired, but I am sure that your jeans feel like they're fitting a bit tighter all of a sudden. Pretty soon, I expect, a lot of us bell-bottomed infornistas are going to wake up in a similar pair of Jordaches. I'm curious which of us will cut the inseams and sew in another totally different material to keep our style,and which of us will claim that now that we're wearing skintight jeans ("they're really really comfortable...REALLY! You think i should get a pair of Reeboks to go with 'em?"), that the manufacture of bell-bottoms should be forbidden. I point this all out in good humour only to illustrate a point: The times, they are('nt) a changin'>, and Cory just might wake up one day soon in his magic kingdom, and say "Hey, man, where'd all my whuffie go? And he's going to have no choice but to join Walt's pinstripesuits in pushing for copyright extension. It's a pill i hope he (and we) never have to swallow. So i pose the question to our community readers: How do you see unmediated-Are we crossing the boundaries in how we repurpose content? Would you like to see more editorializing? Narrower/Broader scope? Are we a repository of information that you come back to use, or just part of your daily information addiction? Let us know... I, for one, would like to have an idea about what pair of jeans to wear this year ;) michael
Featured Project
Berkeley Conference: Online Video and the Future of Television - Friday, September 30, 2005
This one-day conference brings together archivists, educators, technologists, entrepreneurs, producers, legal experts, and investors to explore the enormous promise offered by the availability of online video and television content. Demonstrations and interactive panel discussions will highlight new video technologies, services, legal issues, and economic models. Participants from diverse – and until now, largely disconnected – specialties will be especially encouraged to interact.
del.icio.us/tag/unmediated
[+]
About unmediated
unmediated is a group blog that tracks the tools, processes,
and ideas being used to decentralize media production and distribution.
|
flickr/tag/
citizenmedia
[+]
|