Tracking the tools that decentralize the media. tools process ideas resources eventsav

unmediated

 

April 15, 2005

The U. S. Federal Communications Commission versus Brand X Internet Services is not about cable companies defending the ISP model; it's about them defending the television model. The big U. S. Supreme Court case these days, tech-wise, is Grokster. But the Brand X case is likely to have a bigger impact on everyday consumers. Right now, for example, if you have Cox Communications' cable-TV service, you get both your connection and your programming through Cox. It chooses the networks, the channels, and the pricing structure. The cable companies use this as they argue before the Court -- that because they provide programming as well as the cable, they should be unregulated information providers. You can't get programming from anywhere else; your cable-TV is directly connected to Cox. And Cox is getting feeds from all networks, which it packages and retails to you. That's the model we're all used to, at least when it comes to TV.

The Internet, of course, is different. You get your Net connection from your cable company or your phone company or a local ISP. But you aren't limited to that provider's content -- you have the whole Internet at your fingertips. In other words, you'll be cutting out the middleman. Your data provider will give you the pipe, but then you'll use that connection to go directly to whatever content you want: TV networks, music stations, Web pages, photos etc.

The channel model will be gone. [Yahoo Search: Grokster]

Via Cinema Minima


Originally from Cinema Minima, remediated by yatta on Apr 15, 2005 at 02:21 AM