February 07, 2005
Xeni Jardin:
Verisign subsidiary Jamster is the subject of this online petition by annoyed persons who claim to have been charged for ringtones they didn't willingly purchase. If you ask me, though, the obnioxious late-night TV ads are cause enough for civil disobedience. Link ( Thanks, Hal! via unwired.)
Originally posted by Xeni Jardin from Boing Boing, remediated by jkinberg on Feb 7, 2005 at 12:11 AM
http://mambaprojects.blogspot.com/
Sign the petition. See the blog.... there is by far more to hate about'em than you might have thought!
i don't understand why people hates jamster....coz it's not really their fault...people should read first before they try to download things from certain websites...or they should inquire first before clicking their cellphones...every cellphone owner is liable for their cellphone usage...jamster doesn't have an access to their personal cellphones so jamster is just doing business and people should take note of that....
I people where not that lazy enough to read the fine prints in T.V. and Magazine Ads, there would be no problems, or if they just read the agreement or the terms of agreement on the website of jamster(www.jamster.com) would they better understand what JAMSTER is.....
If people where not that lazy enough to read the fine prints in T.V. and Magazine Ads, there would be no problems, or if they just read the agreement or the terms of service on the website of jamster(www.jamster.com) would they better understand what JAMSTER is.....
And they say that other people from other countries are iliterate, just look at your selves first before looking at others....
people should not be so irresponsible when it comes to giving their children access to cellular phones. it is illegal for minors to download anything and when their children do, they go out and look for other people to blame. why not stop and take a look at themselves first? before you all start throwing stones at our company, better check to see first if you're worthy enough to cast judgement on others...
Those of you obviously receiving a check for your statements, please get a real job that actually HELPS society in some way (please?). Jamster could've done a lot more to prevent their "customers" from having such undesirable problems, but they have no objection to just taking people's money earned through sly means. If a business can't survive without the money made by cheating, it is obviously unwanted and should not exist. Their blatantly annoying advertising (it's like truth.org and the Pepsi girl had a baby with downsyndrome) only goes to show further disrespect for humanity and I can't think of punishment suitable enough for this Jamster.com, seeing as they have a mastery of torture. I cannot accurately portray in words how Jamster so perfectly embodies pure annoyance with every little thing it does, but the word "jam" alone now makes me cringe.
I dont know how jamster got my damn phone#; i am writing to let whomever you are sending me all these advertisements from jamster please STOP i am not interrested. I want to know how to stop you from sending me text messages.
The content that Jamster offers is some of the same content that one could get anywhere else. The fact that they provide this content is not the problem. What IS the problem is the way it is marketed. It's obviously aimed at kids. Their TV ads are primarily on MTV, VH1 and Nickelodeon. What 12 year old is going to read the fine print at the bottom of the screen. All kids see is "FREE RINGTONE IF YOU TEXT BLA BLA BLA to BLA BLA BLA" I'd say less than one could count. It's shameful how Jamster markets their product.
If anybody wants to stop gettin ripped off from from those jamster crooks just text stop to 88888
My girlfriend is getting charged by Jamster, and she has never been to their website. She did get her number changed recently, and that is when the text messages started showing up. So, in this case, this has nothing to do with her "not reading the fine print". Furthermore, T-Mobile has been nothing short of terrible in trying to get this issue resolved.
|
unmediated.av:
The Weekly Show

drawing from extrastruggle.
We've been having a back channel conversation amongst the trackers at unmediated about how/whether to update the way in which we aggregate, present, and make useable the content on the site, in light of all the various aggregators, digg and its clones, and role model group blog sites that we all consume/use/hate/love. Since we all primarily support open media movements and the freedom of bits and so forth, and with all of us being busy with our primary projects, we are looking for ways to make getting content on the site easier and more streamlined, while making it obvious that we are presenting other sources content. With the availability of open API's for just about any type of media aggegration literally getting past the saturation point, and mashups taking every possible form, we are wondering, is it time to take a step back, or a step forward with how/what we do at umediated? In the course of my surfing today, i found this new site, Boxxet Which just might be the straw that breaks the camel's back in how we all perceive the current mix and match nature of the web as it now stands. What's different about Boxxet from other aggregators and mashups like the newest entry popurls, (which aggregates digg, slashdot, reddit, newsvine, tailrank, and flickr) is that Boxxet is a Website generator. Thats right, just pop in all the urls u want to aggregate (and WHAT from them) choose how u want to format it, plug in the url that u want it to be accessed at... and whammo: Your own site with everyone elses content, and all thats left to do is decide whether googleplex or yahooza is going to be the source of your linklove revenue. And if u have on older domain that u plug this into...well, we all know how the pageranking with search engines work by now. It used to be that u had to have a bit of code knowledge to make all this stuff work. Eyebeam's Re-blog engine which powers this site was not a simple undertaking at the time that Michael Frumin and Michael Migurski put it all together... a half a year before Marc Broadband-mechanicked the term Reblog as his latest buzzword before casting his attention on the ourmedia-meme. (kudo's, kudo's) But now, with the cut and paste mentality of webculture that we at unmediated have helped create, the pace at which people are remixing and repurposing code is accelerating at a rate similar to the curve that we saw with pro-sumer desktop video... almost anyone can do it. I have this sinking feeling in my gut that we will arrive sooner than later at the same existential threshold that the film studios and record labels are squirming under to our joyful cries of "die, dinosaurs, die!". What i am wondering, is how long until my hero of the open-information movement, Cory Doctorow, and the rest of our pals at BB will tolerate re-aggregation and repurposing of his content, (now that he is investing so much more time at the site) before he (or any of one us) screams, "FOUL!" Stewart Butterfield over at Flickr is dealing with this beast at the moment...and i have to admire the dryness with which he states, "I loaded the FlickrCentral pool and firefox got up to using 240mb of ram before dying. So that's not a great user experience, but it's really terrible for Flickr. If it catches on and you don't limit it, we'll have to cut you off :\" Sure, Stewart, blame it on the user experience and firefox. ;) I admire your candor, and personal attention/approach to what has become one of the hottest new BRANDS in Web 2.0 ...that u still have time to be personal and all flickr-fuzzy even after being acquired, but I am sure that your jeans feel like they're fitting a bit tighter all of a sudden. Pretty soon, I expect, a lot of us bell-bottomed infornistas are going to wake up in a similar pair of Jordaches. I'm curious which of us will cut the inseams and sew in another totally different material to keep our style,and which of us will claim that now that we're wearing skintight jeans ("they're really really comfortable...REALLY! You think i should get a pair of Reeboks to go with 'em?"), that the manufacture of bell-bottoms should be forbidden. I point this all out in good humour only to illustrate a point: The times, they are('nt) a changin'>, and Cory just might wake up one day soon in his magic kingdom, and say "Hey, man, where'd all my whuffie go? And he's going to have no choice but to join Walt's pinstripesuits in pushing for copyright extension. It's a pill i hope he (and we) never have to swallow. So i pose the question to our community readers: How do you see unmediated-Are we crossing the boundaries in how we repurpose content? Would you like to see more editorializing? Narrower/Broader scope? Are we a repository of information that you come back to use, or just part of your daily information addiction? Let us know... I, for one, would like to have an idea about what pair of jeans to wear this year ;) michael
Featured Project
Berkeley Conference: Online Video and the Future of Television - Friday, September 30, 2005
This one-day conference brings together archivists, educators, technologists, entrepreneurs, producers, legal experts, and investors to explore the enormous promise offered by the availability of online video and television content. Demonstrations and interactive panel discussions will highlight new video technologies, services, legal issues, and economic models. Participants from diverse – and until now, largely disconnected – specialties will be especially encouraged to interact.
del.icio.us/tag/unmediated
[+]
About unmediated
unmediated is a group blog that tracks the tools, processes,
and ideas being used to decentralize media production and distribution.
|
flickr/tag/
citizenmedia
[+]
|
http://mambaprojects.blogspot.com/
Sign the petition. See the blog.... there is by far more to hate about'em than you might have thought!
Posted by: Chris at February 11, 2005 09:59 AM