Tracking the tools that decentralize the media. tools process ideas resources eventsav

unmediated

 

November 28, 2004

Unlicensed Spectrum: The Sum of Fears
"The UK regulator, Ofcom, has decided that managing spectrum is a drag, and there are other people around that might do a better job. It is going to open up 73 percent of the radio spectrum to market forces, and make it technology-neutral and tradeable. So if one technology gets superseded, another one can get rolled out instead (subject to broadcast power limits) without Ofcom having to define what spectrum it should use.

Radio was first regulated here 100 years ago this year, and a new regime is needed to fit new radio technology. Ofcom is quite proud to be ahead of the US on this one, because we have a recent Communications Act, and the FCC is 'hamstrung' by old laws - at least that's what the head of research at Ofcom said."
Mike Masnick says it's more like "open market" spectrum. The spectrum is still licensed, but once licensed, the owner has much more flexibility in doing what they want with it. The Spectrum Framework Review sets out four key recommendations:
  1. Allow the market to decide the best use for new spectrum allocations.
  2. Allow licence holders to trade spectrum in an open market and change the use they make of spectrum rights to develop new technologies and offer different services to customers (also known as liberalisation).
  3. Clearly define the rights of spectrum users, giving them the confidence to plan for the future.
  4. Increase the amount of licence-exempt spectrum which allows businesses to develop and bring to market new technologies and services without the need for a licence.

In the United States, Nextel, Sprint and Clearwire own most of the 2.5-2.7 GHz band (MMDS). Nextel expects to make a decision on next generation technology in January and is reportedly looking for an alliance with a cable operator.

(Continued at DailyWireless)

Posted by yatta at 11:11 PM