Tracking the tools that decentralize the media. tools process ideas resources eventsav

unmediated

 

November 29, 2004

Three Questions About BitTorrent and RSS
* Could BitTorrent / RSS be a winning combination for cable companies (providing both TV and Internet) and Bells, in order to give them significant advantage over satellite TV distributors? Links: Fortune article by Frank Rose (similar article just appeared in December issue of Wired), set:TOP of DV Guide ...

* Does BitTorrent/RSs combination makes sense in the context of cell phone IP based networks? Mentioned DV Guide could be adapted to carry and distribute small 30 seconds clips via BT/RSS to mobile phones. Which are built almost as ready made set:TOP boxes nowadays ...

* Is there any torrent search engine that can crawl and search by media file hash signature? Or alternatively, is there any procedure or sketch of a standard to encrypt ENCLOSURE tag from RSS toward a specific recipient(s)? Search engine could provide effective tool to document number of downloads, while encrypting part of RSS feed could enable targeted distribution toward subscribers ...

UPDATE: 11/30/2004:

Yesterday I've asked some questions about BitTorrent and RSS. To refresh the discussion, today I post a diagram of potential target customers ...


Posted by drazen at 10:26 PM


Comments

1. YES!!!!!! If you already have a large audience, this makes digital distribution much easier. Of course, the cable companies already have the copper. A large audience following a small under-budget is ideal.

2. Hrmm... *maybe* ... BT is meant for big files (> 1 meg, or honestly, >10 megs, downloaded by more that 4 people at a time)

3. RSS Categories could provide targetting. Dave Winer has recently unveiled a draft BT enclosure format for RSS 2.0 ... GUID of a feed item could be the info_hash of a .torrent, but a good consensus on rss-dev on yahoo was that a GUID is a "globally unique identifier" while a hash (SHA-1) just makes sure that things are *different* ... not that they are same in *some* way... like a different encoding of the same media. That would make a different hash, but you may or may not want that media to have the same GUID.

A little more, you could use a double-key-escrow system to handle your targetting as well. Yes, that's PPV w/ billing. BUT, you need to know each subscribers' public keys. They have your public key... you'll need to encrypt everything to their systems with their public key, but honestly, once they decrypt.

Posted by: Thomas Winningham at November 30, 2004 01:28 AM

The question is if the net is being built for P2P-applications. I would argue that it's not at the moment.

In fact, i wrote a longer piece on it on my blog, just last night:

Dude, where's my upload:
http://jturn.qem.se/archives/2004/12/dude_wheres_my.shtml

Posted by: Jonathan Lundqvist at December 7, 2004 07:40 AM

Thanks - really interesting post. Agreed fully on the importance of
upstream. In an earlier article I called that Conceptual Digital Divide. My argument was that early marketing Internet paradigm was building on existing TV model:

href=http://www.open4all.info/wiki/drazen/Conceptual_Digital_Divide


But, situation being as it is, BitTorrent is probably the best we
have. Now question is: can we make a viable and honest business on that
infrastructure, building video networks bottom up, using BitTorrent,
RSS and blogs? I certainly think yes ...

Posted by: drazen at December 7, 2004 08:02 PM

Excerpt:
Post a comment









Remember personal info?