September 09, 2004
 Citizens' media in action.
In the midst of last week's RNC-related media activities, I forgot to post something about the most unmediated of them all - the story of how the arrest of Josh Kinberg spread through the blogosphere.
On the Saturday before the convention started, Joshua Kinberg was arrested while demonstrating his BikesAgainstBush chalk-writer project in an interview with MSNBC. Because there was precedent for expressing political speech in chalk the reasons for his arrest were questionable. It seemed to be a story that should be public. I spoke to people I knew at major media outlets but none of them were in a position to cover the story. So I did it myself. Not as a journalist or a professional media maker but as a citizen.
So I used my blog, an alternative media news site, and p2p file sharing to help share the news of Josh's arrest and, in the process, found that citizens' media could help give a story greater impact than if it were covered in traditional media alone.
On August 28th, Josh Kinberg is arrested and his bicycle confiscated under questionable circumstances a day before the RNC actually started. Fortunately, Josh's advisor on the project, Yury Gitman is there to document it all with his camcorder. He captures the video to his laptop and puts it online as an MPEG4 clip that he emails out to friends.
I watch the clip, then make a torrent of it which I upload to DV Guide. After calling Yury to clear up some details, I set to writing a short article describing the arrest and post the article to indymedia. I email a link to the article to a few of my friends, fire up my newsreader and wait.
Within six hours, the indymedia post is linked on Boing Boing and Slashdot. Within 24 hours, Joi Ito and Jason Kottke have picked it up (with Jason even "re-seeding" the clip as a d/l on his site). By the time Monday rolls around, DV Guide has registered over 4500 completed downloads and 400 seeders. Josh's story is being covered by media outlets (other than MSNBC) and CNN is asking Yury if they can use the torrent footage in their broadcast (Guess they didn't understand the Creative Commons thing.)
I haven't had time to really think about what any of this means, but I did jot down a few ideas that I should probably expand upon at some later time (sorry if I ramble):
- Trusted sources matter. A post to indymedia or kottke or slashdot or boingboing means a lot more than a post to my personal blog -- if for no other reason than access to the eyeballs. (But all of these sources started out as simple personal/citizens media projects themselves. They built their audiences up through a simple recipe of trust, respect, and sincerity -- you know, standard Shirky+Corante stuff.) Some nodes will always be more important than others, and that's a good thing.
- Once posted on a site with a good number of eyeballs (I sound like ESR), the community will push it up (to more popular blogs) without your intervention if they feel the story is important enough.
- Compelling media matters. When artist Steve Kurtz was arrested back in May (a similar case with even worse possible consequences), it took a good 4-7 days before you saw the story spread through most of the blogosphere. In Josh's case, the immediacy of the RNC was a definite factor, but I like to speculate that it was the existence of compelling video that helped the story spread so quickly. (Besides, there were plenty of other questionable arrests that weekend.)
- Great citizens media hubs already exist (but they tend to have lots of political associations that make them unattractive to some folks. The newer citizens' media projects should study and learn from them. (indymedia was effective.)
- Citizens media and major media can compliment each other just fine.
Posted by yatta at 06:02 AM
|
unmediated.av:
The Weekly Show

drawing from extrastruggle.
We've been having a back channel conversation amongst the trackers at unmediated about how/whether to update the way in which we aggregate, present, and make useable the content on the site, in light of all the various aggregators, digg and its clones, and role model group blog sites that we all consume/use/hate/love. Since we all primarily support open media movements and the freedom of bits and so forth, and with all of us being busy with our primary projects, we are looking for ways to make getting content on the site easier and more streamlined, while making it obvious that we are presenting other sources content. With the availability of open API's for just about any type of media aggegration literally getting past the saturation point, and mashups taking every possible form, we are wondering, is it time to take a step back, or a step forward with how/what we do at umediated? In the course of my surfing today, i found this new site, Boxxet Which just might be the straw that breaks the camel's back in how we all perceive the current mix and match nature of the web as it now stands. What's different about Boxxet from other aggregators and mashups like the newest entry popurls, (which aggregates digg, slashdot, reddit, newsvine, tailrank, and flickr) is that Boxxet is a Website generator. Thats right, just pop in all the urls u want to aggregate (and WHAT from them) choose how u want to format it, plug in the url that u want it to be accessed at... and whammo: Your own site with everyone elses content, and all thats left to do is decide whether googleplex or yahooza is going to be the source of your linklove revenue. And if u have on older domain that u plug this into...well, we all know how the pageranking with search engines work by now. It used to be that u had to have a bit of code knowledge to make all this stuff work. Eyebeam's Re-blog engine which powers this site was not a simple undertaking at the time that Michael Frumin and Michael Migurski put it all together... a half a year before Marc Broadband-mechanicked the term Reblog as his latest buzzword before casting his attention on the ourmedia-meme. (kudo's, kudo's) But now, with the cut and paste mentality of webculture that we at unmediated have helped create, the pace at which people are remixing and repurposing code is accelerating at a rate similar to the curve that we saw with pro-sumer desktop video... almost anyone can do it. I have this sinking feeling in my gut that we will arrive sooner than later at the same existential threshold that the film studios and record labels are squirming under to our joyful cries of "die, dinosaurs, die!". What i am wondering, is how long until my hero of the open-information movement, Cory Doctorow, and the rest of our pals at BB will tolerate re-aggregation and repurposing of his content, (now that he is investing so much more time at the site) before he (or any of one us) screams, "FOUL!" Stewart Butterfield over at Flickr is dealing with this beast at the moment...and i have to admire the dryness with which he states, "I loaded the FlickrCentral pool and firefox got up to using 240mb of ram before dying. So that's not a great user experience, but it's really terrible for Flickr. If it catches on and you don't limit it, we'll have to cut you off :\" Sure, Stewart, blame it on the user experience and firefox. ;) I admire your candor, and personal attention/approach to what has become one of the hottest new BRANDS in Web 2.0 ...that u still have time to be personal and all flickr-fuzzy even after being acquired, but I am sure that your jeans feel like they're fitting a bit tighter all of a sudden. Pretty soon, I expect, a lot of us bell-bottomed infornistas are going to wake up in a similar pair of Jordaches. I'm curious which of us will cut the inseams and sew in another totally different material to keep our style,and which of us will claim that now that we're wearing skintight jeans ("they're really really comfortable...REALLY! You think i should get a pair of Reeboks to go with 'em?"), that the manufacture of bell-bottoms should be forbidden. I point this all out in good humour only to illustrate a point: The times, they are('nt) a changin'>, and Cory just might wake up one day soon in his magic kingdom, and say "Hey, man, where'd all my whuffie go? And he's going to have no choice but to join Walt's pinstripesuits in pushing for copyright extension. It's a pill i hope he (and we) never have to swallow. So i pose the question to our community readers: How do you see unmediated-Are we crossing the boundaries in how we repurpose content? Would you like to see more editorializing? Narrower/Broader scope? Are we a repository of information that you come back to use, or just part of your daily information addiction? Let us know... I, for one, would like to have an idea about what pair of jeans to wear this year ;) michael
Featured Project
Berkeley Conference: Online Video and the Future of Television - Friday, September 30, 2005
This one-day conference brings together archivists, educators, technologists, entrepreneurs, producers, legal experts, and investors to explore the enormous promise offered by the availability of online video and television content. Demonstrations and interactive panel discussions will highlight new video technologies, services, legal issues, and economic models. Participants from diverse – and until now, largely disconnected – specialties will be especially encouraged to interact.
del.icio.us/tag/unmediated
[+]
About unmediated
unmediated is a group blog that tracks the tools, processes,
and ideas being used to decentralize media production and distribution.
|
flickr/tag/
citizenmedia
[+]
|